EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR NEWLY LICENSED NURSES IN REDUCING TURNOVER RATES

Authors

  • Sahar Nasser Alshahrani, Jehan Safer Muteb Alotaibi, Hessa Abdullah Alosaimi, Hanan Hassan Jalwai Alanezi, Manal Namer Alchibani, Aeshah Musre Alabsi Ghadeer Mubark Albishi, Modhi Ali Ahmad nasiri, Manal Ali Ahmad nasiri, Ashwaq Mohammed alshubaily Author

Abstract

High turnover rates among newly licensed nurses pose a critical threat to the stability and effectiveness of healthcare systems globally. Transitioning from academic settings to clinical practice is often overwhelming for new nurses, leading to stress, burnout, dissatisfaction, and premature exits from the profession. Peer support programs have emerged as a promising strategy to address these challenges, offering structured mentorship, emotional support, and professional guidance to foster confidence, job satisfaction, and workplace integration. This paper explores the effectiveness of peer support programs in reducing turnover rates among newly licensed nurses. Through a comprehensive review of the literature, the study highlights the key components of these programs, including mentorship, skill development, and emotional support, and examines their impact on retention, professional development, and job satisfaction. Despite challenges such as resource constraints and variability in program implementation, evidence suggests that peer support programs significantly enhance retention rates, improve job satisfaction, and accelerate the professional socialization of new nurses. Recommendations for overcoming implementation barriers include investing in mentor training, standardizing program design, and fostering supportive organizational cultures. Peer support programs represent a crucial solution for addressing nurse turnover and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the nursing workforce.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR NEWLY LICENSED NURSES IN REDUCING TURNOVER RATES. (2024). International Development Planning Review, 23(2), 1382-1392. https://idpr.org.uk/index.php/idpr/article/view/471